PERAN HASIL TES PENJURUSAN STUDI TERHADAP PEMILIHAN JURUSAN PADA SISWA SMA
Sari
ABSTRACT
This research aims: 1) To elicit major suggestion by Intelligenz Structure Test (IST); 2) To elicit major suggestion by Self Directed Search (SDS) results. 3) To find out role and effects the major placement test results to decide major preference for high school students.
This research conducts Krectjie table as determination of sample numbers. The sample is the major placement test results which implemented to 396 high school students. They are 254 students from science majors and 142 from social majors. The research also applies random sampling method. Furthermore, the hypothetic test adapts non parametric analyzing technic of Chi Square.
This research shows how significant differences between major suggestion from Intelligenz Structure Test (IST) results, Self Direct Search (SDS), and school recommendation. Proved by Chi-Square value at 222.173 with significance level 0.000 (0%) for frequency major suggestion differentiations from school recommendation, based on IST test. 32.536 with significance level 0.000 (0%) and 5.172 with significance level 0.023 (2.3%) for frequency major suggestion differentiations from school recommendation, based on SDS. 95.713 with significance level 0.000 (0%) and 149.414 with significance level 0.000 (0%) for frequency differentiation major suggestion by IST test from SDS test, also 221.90 and 45.306 with significance level 0.000 (0%) for frequency differentiation major suggestion based on placement test (IST and SDS) from school recommendation. Regarding to those results, show that there are some significant differences between school recommendation and test results. Those are not accidentally raise.
Key words: Major Placement Test, Intelligenz Structure Test (IST), Self-Directed Search (SDS), Major Preferences, High School.
Teks Lengkap:
PDFReferensi
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Anastasi, A. & Urbina, S. 1997. Tes Psikologi. Edisi Ketujuh (Terjemahan). Jakarta: PT Indeks.
Azwar, S. 1996, Tes Prestasi, Fungsi dan Pengembangan Pengukuran Prestasi Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
________. 2009. Metode Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
________. 2011. Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Brown, F.G. 1976 Principle of Educational and Psychological Testing, 2nd edition. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston
Cronbrach, L. J. 1970, Essentials of Psychological Testing. 3rd edition. New York. NY: Harper and Row.
Dinarga, M. S. dkk. 2004. Jurusan Apa Buat Kamu? Panduan Tepat Bagi Siswa SMA, Kejuruan & Calon Mahasiswa. Yogyakarta: Andi
Direktorat Jenderal Manajemen Pendidikan dasar dan Menengah. 2006. Panduan Penyusunan Laporan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik berdasarkan (KTSP) Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA). Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional
Hadi, S. 2000. Statistik Jilid 2. Yogyakarta: Andi
Hafsah, dkk. 2008. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Jurusan Di SMU Dengan Logika Fuzzy. Seminar Nasional Informatika 2008 (Semnasif 2008) Issn: 1979-2328. UPN ”Veteran” Yogyakarta.
Hidayati,D.N. 2009. Pengaruh Pemilihan Jurusan Terhadap Motivasi Belajar Siswa Kelas XI SMA Negeri I Pandaan. Skripsi, Program Studi Pendidikan Ekonomi Jurusan Ekonomi Pembangunan Fakultas Ekonomi. Universitas Negeri Malang.
Holland, J. L. 1985. Making Vocational Choices, A Theory of Vocational Personalities and Work Environments, 2nd Edition. New Jersey : Prentice Hall, Inc
_____________ 1994. You and Your Career, Self Directed Search, Form R 4th Edition, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resiurces, Inc
_____________ 1994. Assessment Booklet, A Guide to Educational and Career Planning, Self Directed Search, Form R 4th Edition, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resiurces, Inc
Hope, A. E. 1994. Pengantar Eksplorasi Karir, The Self Directed Search. Seminar, Lokakarya, dan Konsultasi Orientasi Studi di Perguruan Tinggi. Yogyakarta: Pusat Pengembangan Pribadi UKDW
Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 2012. Dokumen Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan
Kompasian. 2012. Anak SMA Ga’ Usah Memaksakan Diri Masuk Kelas IPA, Kenali Kemampuan Diri http://edukasi.kompasiana.com/2012/02/25/anak-sma-ga-usah-memaksakan-diri-masuk-kelas-ipa-kenali-kemampuan-diri/ diunduh tanggal 22 Januari 2013.
Mirawati, dkk. 2012. Studi Tentang Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Siswa Kelas XI SMA Negri 1 Rao Kabupaten Pasaman Dalam Memilih Jurusan IPA. Skripsi Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi Universitas Negrei Padang. Sumatera Barat.
Nurgiyantoro, dkk, 2012. Statistik Terapan Untuk Penelitan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press
Patrick F. F. and Joseph A. J. 1999. The Self Directed Search and Career Self-Efficacy. Journal of Career Assessment, Volume 7/Number 2/Pages 145-159
Purwanto, 2008 , Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif untuk Psikologi dan Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Robert C. R and Janet G. L. 1999. Holland’s Theory and Career Assessment. Journal of Vocational Behavior 55, 102-113
Soenarto, 1987. Teknik Sampling. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada
Wiratna, A. 1993. Intelligenz Structure Test-IST (Tidak Diterbitkan). Yogyakarta: Lembaga Pendidikan Perkebunan.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30738/spirits.v5i1.1056
Article Metrics
Sari view : 65 timesPDF - 940 times



JURNAL SPIRITS: Khasanah Psikologi Nusantara
Jl. Kusumanegara 157, Kelurahan Muja-Muju, Kecamatan Umbulharjo,
Kota Yogyakarta 55165
Jurnal Spirit is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.